Ivanka Must be Removed from Positions of Policy Influence

From the Today show, via Chateau Heartiste:

Assistant to the president and first daughter Ivanka Trump said allowing Syrian refugees into the U.S. “has to be part of the discussion” of how best to help those fleeing Islamic State militants and Syria’s long-running civil war.

No. We didn’t elect her. As Heartiste says, she has failed the “doe-eyed suffering child” test. She’s too easily swayed by propaganda operatives playing on her heartstrings. Remove her from advisory positions, Mr. President.

The people who put you in power basically want one thing: that you defend the country.

The Left hates you. The establishment Republicans despise you. Your base – that means your allies – consists of people who understand the urgency of defending the nation.

Ivanka, and people like her, whisper counsels of surrender in your ear. The force of such counsels might be magnified if you think the media will say nice things about you if you cave in on this. I’m pretty sure you have the contempt for the media that they deserve, but just in case:

(1) No, they won’t say nice things about you. They hate you and will take great delight in dragging you over the coals even after you have surrendered to them. That’s what they always do. More conventional GOP politicians than you have learned this the hard way.

(2) Infinitely more importantly, remember that we are at war. You don’t let the enemy sway you, you don’t heed the enemy’s praise or their insults. You are a war President. That’s why we elected you. Your time in the White House must be a time of strife, conflict, fighting, battle. Discard now any thought of playing nice with enemies. Abandon any thought of even the tiniest unnecessary concession. In war, you defeat your enemies, you don’t try to make them like you.

People who urge surrender, even if it is from mistaken good intentions, must be removed from positions of influence before they irrevocably damage the country.

So as to Ivanka: Beloved daughter, sure. Policy advisor, NO.

Iron Mike takes the snowflake fascists to school

Iron Mike lays into the snowflake fascists:
A Message to ANTIFA from an American Infantryman:

Alright fucksticks, this circus has gone on long enough and the audience has gotten tired of the clowns doing the same act for months on end. Your special snowflake brand of socialist revolution (black masks and tipped over trash cans) is sputtering out from underneath you. You’re not any more dedicated and disciplined at seeing this through than you were moving out of your parents’ guest bedroom after your “one semester off” 4 years ago.

The best humor is basically truth.

And you can’t be subtle with people who ate too much of the finger paints in art class when they were kids:

Your little red & black flag of ‘Anarcho-Communism’ might as well be a goddamn Bat-Signal that you were on a first name basis with the driver of the short bus as a kid. Anarchism is the complete lack of formal government. Communism is the complete ownership of all property by the State and a state-planned central command economy.

Not that these fuckwits care about truth, but they should at least TRY to come up with an ideology better than “four-sided triangle.”

With that level of brain damage, it’s like your mom tried to drown you as a baby in a bathtub full of bong water.

Mom failed at that, which, let’s be honest, doesn’t say much for her level of mentation either. Genes will tell.

People who can’t manage to make Assistant Manager at Best Buy have the wherewithal to form a completely new society? Really? … Losers always gravitate towards collectivism because they are too inadequate to succeed on their own.

This is the one that will really hurt. Not only are they fucking idiots; they’re ugly too. Seriously, have you ever seen any of these losers on the right side of the attractiveness bell curve? There’s a reason Marxists version 1.0 were so loud about “free love”: They couldn’t get any booty on their own.

To circle back to Mike’s first sentence, what happens when normal people get fed up with this shit? Well, we saw that in the Third Battle of Berkeley, April 15, 2017: Snowflakes get curb-stomped. The screeching and panic among them afterward was utterly priceless: “Hey, wait a minute! They’re fighting back! Can they do that?”

Yes, you little assholes, they can. And things don’t work out so well for you when they do, huh?

Mike sums it up:

I’m sure sucker-punching people and pepper-spraying women was fun for you while it lasted. Now however, there are those among your opposition prepared to meet your aggression in kind… Your days of ganging up to beat people and pepper-spraying women with impunity are over.

(Via Vox Day.)

On the Syria Thing: Everyone Calm the Fuck Down

Thoughts on the Syria thing, with a detour on immigration that got a little out of hand.

Many on the Alt-Right are flipping their shit over the Syria bombing. For fuck’s sake, people, Trump just bombed an airstrip. (It was evacuated first, by the way.)

One hyperventilating doofus has said something to the effect of, “Oh My God! He’s going to betray all his promises! He hasn’t done anything on immigration either!”

What the unholy fuck?

He put forth two Executive Orders limiting immigration from predominantly Muslim countries. He put forth another EO starting the Wall-building process. Yes, both of the Muslim-nation immigration ones were attacked by dictators in black robes, but guys, THE GOD-EMPEROR WAS OBVIOUSLY WAITING TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT UNTIL AFTER GORSUCH’S CONFIRMATION. Which was like, 72 hours ago as of this writing. Jesus, calm the fuck down!

Trump will appeal his immigration EOs to the SC. If the SC tries to shoot them down, even with Gorsuch on hand, then my man Trumpy will instruct immigration enforcement officials to ignore the Court’s illegal repudiation of the law. That’s my prediction. I think Trump understands that if we cave on immigration, we’re done.

There’s plenty of room for other kinds of advances on immigration as well. E.g., he could push a law through Congress. Yeah, I know, I know, but hear me out: Congresspunks know at this point that this is the number one issue for much of white America. They enjoy selling out the country, and they like keeping their corporate sponsors happy with cheap immigrant labor, but they like remaining in office even more. In between immigration measures that are useless symbolism, and those that are “too extreme” for the cucks and lefties, there is plenty of scope for making progress.

Hell, just enforcing the immigration laws we have on the books right now would solve a significant amount of the problem. There’s a hell of a lot that the Chief Executive of the Federal government can do about enforcement. Have y’all already forgotten the burst of immigration raids from a few weeks ago?

All this panic, with members of the right running around with their hair on fire, would be hilarious if it weren’t so stupid and counterproductive. Guys, haven’t you learned yet? The man is extremely intelligent and he’s on our side, the side of the nation. He’s been damn perceptive so far about what moves he can make at what speed. Don’t demand total victory within five minutes of his taking the Oath of Office; you’re gonna give yourself a heart attack.

Getting back to the Syria thing: So he bombed a desert airstrip. Who cares? That doesn’t matter unless it gradually leads to a commitment of troops. I think the T-Dawg’s aware of the stupidity of that, given all his tweets on the subject in the past. Also, given all the noise his supporters are making about the bombing. When your own inclinations and your base are pushing you in the same direction, you’re going to move in that direction, absent some huge countervailing factor.

Furthermore, there are a few possibilities that suggest that this was a well-thought-out move. See Vox Day’s blog, for example. The Syria bombing could be:

(a) a way to distract North Korea ahead of a possible move against them by China,
(b) a way to prevent the normalization of using chemical weapons (we really don’t want WMDs normalized; think about it),
(c) a way to establish credible threats with various unfriendly nations and groups. That possibility will meet a annoyed reaction on the right, now that the right has taken a sharp isolationist turn. But guys, you can’t be secure by saying, “I’m nice! I’m harmless! I’ll never use my military!” Not on this planet. One bombing is not a trend, a move to a new pattern of globe-spanning military interventionism. Sheesh.
(d) a way to mollify various saber-rattlers. Now Trumpy is so Alpha he doesn’t really need to mollify jack shit, except for his own base, but if he sees there’s an advantage to doing so – say because it elicits concessions from various folks – then good.
(e) a way to discredit the insane Trump-is-conspiring-with-Russia meme the Left is desperately pushing. (Since Assad is a Russian client.) Now you shouldn’t let your enemies jerk you around by changing your behavior to discredit their lies. But suppose one or more of the above is true. In that case, Trumpy notices some gravy from opposing a Russia-supported regime. He chortles because he was going to do this anyway, and it suddenly has made the ridiculous Trump = Russia BS even harder for the Left to peddle. LOL. I guarantee you, at least one editor of a major Old Media newspaper, upon hearing about the Syria strike, had a major screaming fit. Probably threw objects at the walls, subordinates, etc. “How are we going to peddle the Russia bullshit when Trump just bombed a Russian client!? God DAMN it!” Ha, I can just see it.

So, to summarize: Stop the fucking panic terror. It’s completely irrational.

Red-pill classic quotes, Part 1

The past is a gold mine of red-pill truth.

E.g., Nietzsche, Beyond Good & Evil (Walter Kaufman’s translation):

Epigram 84:
Woman learns to hate to the extent to which her charms—decrease.

Quite. Most psychotic feminists who hate the world in general, and men in particular, are ugly (this includes fat of course, fat being a special case of ugliness).

Epigram 131:
Man likes woman peaceful – but woman is essentially unpeaceful, like a cat, however well she may have trained herself to seem peacable.

This quote identifies one kind of what we now call drama queenery (queenage?) and shit testing. Woman is restless when there is no strife. She feels that she is being unjustly suffocated; some bastard is forcing boredom upon her.

This personality feature is evolutionarily advantageous for females because it encourages them to create strife. Obviously, that’s a variety of shit test. Thus they find out who are the strong men and who are the weak ones.

In revenge and in love woman is more barbarous than man.

Of course, Nietzsche wasn’t the first to note this. “Hell hath no fury…”

Even when the Old School stuff isn’t true, it sure is refreshing to read things that you Just Don’t Say these days. A case in point, where alas, I must disagree with ol’ Fred:

When a woman has scholarly inclinations it usually means there is something wrong with her sexually.

I may be biased because I dig on intellectual chicks. I love how politically incorrect this one is, though.

Alt-Right dudes might harsh me for this, but to a large extent that’s because many of them have unfortunately fallen for the lie – deliberately created by feminists, of course – that “intellectual chick” essentially means “feminist.” Gaaahhh! Why does anyone fall for this when feminists not only are morons, but in fact explicitly reject logic as a white male rhetorical trap?

So I’d better clarify that by “intellectual chick” I actually mean “intellectual chick.” There aren’t a lot of them, but there’s something about them. And damn they’re good in bed. My theory: Too much time in the library ➞ Need to cut loose.

Woman would not have the genius for finery if she did not have an instinct for a secondary role.

Wow. Awesome. Even in the 1880s, that may have been somewhat un-PC.

From old Florentine novels; also—from life: “Buona femmina e mala femmina vuol bastone.”

(The Italian: “Good women and bad women want a stick.”)

By the way, you know who else is a really good source of politically incorrect quotes? Women. Get three beers in them, then get them talking.

There are plenty of chicks who would object furiously to the foregoing quote, but get a couple of beers in them and it’s “I need it! My body needs it!”

From Thus Spake Zarathustra (Hollingdale trans.):

As I went on my way alone to-day, at the hour when the sun declineth, there met me an old woman, and she spake thus unto my soul:

“Much hath Zarathustra spoken also to us women, but never spake he unto us concerning woman.”

And I answered her: “Concerning woman, one should only talk unto men.”

Well, of course. You can’t discuss with women the topic of how to handle women. That would be like telling the enemy how you plan on defeating them in an upcoming battle. Men and women aren’t enemies, exactly, but there is a certain amount of adversariality.

Aside from that, there’s the general futility and counterproductivity of discussing women with women. At best they’ll be balky and annoying, and at worst they’ll either flip out or fill your head with outrageous lies. (“We like nice guys!”) Women, as I am hardly the first man to observe, do not handle criticism well. To put it mildly.

(This is called Part 1 because there’s sure to be more in the future.)

“Escalation traps”

Xenosystems quotes Richard Fernandez:

It will inevitably occur to someone that the advantage in an escalation trap belongs to the side which cares about America less since there is no point at which it will desist for pity’s sake.

The quote gets it backward. We have the advantage in this situation precisely because we know the other side means to destroy us: We have nothing to gain from backing down and everything to lose. Backing down means we’re destroyed, not just as a culture, but in the literal sense too. It has become obvious in recent years that the left plans to commit genocide against native western populations if they can get away with it.

Indeed, one of the many reasons that Trump’s election has alarmed them so deeply is that it signals that more of those populations have figured out what their plans are. (This is one of the reasons that the standard “That’s racist!” attacks had no effect with white voters.) The left knows what it means for them if a critical mass – and it doesn’t have to be 50% by any means – of traditional western populations figure out what they intend.