Everybody Lies About Sex

“Everybody lies about sex.” – Robert Heinlein

Funny fact: Since the number of women roughly equals the number of men, the average number of heterosexual sexual partners women have had must be roughly equal to the average number of heterosexual sexual partners men have had. In a study of US and UK non-virgins, ~40-year-old women reported having on average 8.6 male sexual partners and ~40-year-old men reported having on average 31.9 female sexual partners. Absolutely priceless.

PS: 100th post, whoo-hoo! Now that I’ve got you addicted, I’m going to double the price for reading this blog.


Non-US Citizen Invites Illegal Immigrants into the US

Justin Wolfers, Australian citizen teaching at the University of Michigan:

“My message to #Dreamers at @umich is simple: Welcome to class.”

says the Australian living in the US. According to Wikipedia, his nationality is simply Australian; he didn’t even bother to get dual US-Australian citizenship before he started inviting people to illegally enter our country.

My message to Justin Wolfers: Go fuck yourself.

Then go back to your office, scratch your head, and wonder why Trump won.

One Ex-Feminist’s Experience with Feminism

Via the Dark Herald:

Ultra-feminist founder of Femen Brazil declares herself pro life, apologizes

In her new book “Bitch, no! Seven times I was betrayed by Feminism” (Vadia não! Sete vezes que fui traída pelo feminismo), Giromini writes that she was repeatedly pushed to do drugs, to engage in sex with strangers, and was even molested by a lesbian, all at the hands of feminists who claimed to be fighting for women’s equality.

The Left isn’t really a political movement; it’s evil and insane people using the language of politics to advance their evil and insanity in the world and inflict it on everyone else.

“We like nice guys! We don’t like jerks!”

“We like nice guys! We don’t like jerks!”
“What about that time you slept with Chad?”
“That was just because I was drunk! Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with Jason?”
“That was just because he was sooooo hot! Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with Eric?”
“He’s not really a jerk, he just seems that way sometimes because he had a really difficult childhood and (blah blah)… Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with Martin?”
“That was just because I was on the rebound from my breakup with Fred! Doesn’t count!”
“Speaking of Fred…”
“That was years ago! I was young and confused! Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with John?”
“That was just because he was really good at putting up a front. He really seemed nice at first! Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with Adam?”
“That was just because I was on a huge dry spell and super-horny. I had no judgment and just grabbed the first guy who came along. Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with Rob?”
“I knew he was a jerk, but thought I could change him to a nice guy. Doesn’t count!”
“What about that time you slept with Neurotoxin?”
“That was just because all my girlfriends told me what an enormous cock he has! Doesn’t count!”
“Doesn’t count!”
“Doesn’t count!”
“What about–”
“Doesn’t count!”
“Are you noticing a pattern in this–”
“Doesn’t count!”
“Doesn’t count!”

Notice the one consistent pattern in all this, ladies: It was a never a nice guy that you hopped into bed with in all those “exceptional circumstances.” It wasn’t a nice guy you fucked because he was “sooooo hot.” It wasn’t a nice guy you fucked because you were young and confused. It wasn’t a nice guy you fucked because you were on the rebound from your breakup with Fred. It wasn’t a nice guy you fucked because you were on a huge dry spell and super-horny. No, somehow the men you hopped into bed with under those “exceptional circumstances” always just happened to be jerks.

The stupidest excuse of them all is “I knew he was a jerk, but thought I could change him to a nice guy.” There are tons of guys out there who are already nice. If you really wanted a nice guy you’d simply have grabbed one of them. These nice guys are all available, too. Which also makes my point; think about it.

On that note: Last year my woman and I were catching up on some DVR’d episodes of the first or second season of Agents of Shield. [MAMMOTH SPOILER WARNING.] Ward has been revealed as a merciless remorseless utterly inhuman sadistic psychopathic serial murderer who tried to kill all his former comrades and who did kill many Shield agents, not to mention his own brother and his brother’s family. So my woman starts analyzing him as if he’s a normal human being. “Oh, it’s like his older brother forced him to threaten his other, younger brother, so he had to turn off his emotions and (blah blah blah).”

I sat there staring at her, agape, almost unable to believe what I was hearing. My chick is actually an intelligent person. But because she was born with two X chromosomes, observing an utterly remorseless multiple murderer shuts off her brain’s ability to think and auto-kick-starts an excuse-making algorithm. Colloquially, we call that the Hamster, but the name will make the Hamster surprise you. It’s not a friendly, furry little guy who makes women do cute, silly things. It makes them find excuses for multiple murderers. Filtered through female neural mechanisms that evolved in the African savanna half a million years ago, “multiple murderer” parses out as “dominant male.” He has the physical ability, and the ruthlessness, to kill and get away with it.

People who think the Manosphere is excessively negative about women need to actually observe women in the real world.

(Well OK, parts of the Manosphere can, in fact, be excessively negative about women. But still, anyone who thinks they don’t have a point really does need to observe actual women.)

In fact, we need an expression to replace “the Hamster.” “The Hamster” is far too harmless-sounding. A now-defunct blog (In Mala Fide, IIRC) once referred to “the world-shaking amorality of the gina tingle.” While “gina tingle” is too comedic, “world-shaking amorality” captures the reality we need a tag for.

Females Initiate by Display

From the Dark Herald:

The thing about a major convention is that the cosplay girls are there to put themselves on display. This is perfectly right and proper. The thing to remember about girls is this, the need for male attention is instinctive in the female of our species. They have no choice about this, it is a genuine biologically driven priority because a female that doesn’t gain male attention, will not reproduce. Simple but there it is. Sex is receptive for a human female, they initiate by display.

If you’ve been to college you know that’s not the only way they initiate, but it is a main way, arguably the main way.

The real question is why they deny it. “I know it’s 2 degrees out, but the reason I’m wearing this low-cut blouse that shows everything but nipple is to keep cool!” Who do they think they’re fooling?

Political Correctness Ruins Everything: Satanism Edition

The Washington Post recently ran a piece titled I’m a founder of the Satanic temple. Don’t blame Satan for white supremacy.

(Subheading: “Calling hatred Satanic just lets people off the hook.”)

The doofus who wrote this says,

I identify nontheistically with a Miltonic Satan that defies all subjugation, exalts scientific inquiry and promotes Humanistic, pluralistic values. The Satan of Modern Satanism is a metaphorical icon for Enlightenment values.

Enlightenment… you can’t… Miltonic… it… (sputter).

Look, doofus, some of us have actually read Milton’s Paradise Lost. At no point in that work are we shown a Satan who “defies all subjugation,” “exalts scientific inquiry” (what the fuck?), or “promotes Humanistic, pluralistic values.” He wants everyone in hell, subjugated to him, the “scientific” thing is just weird, as is the bizarre thing about pluralism, and the assertion of Humanistic values is particularly brazen. Satan, in Paradise Lost, wants Adam and Eve and all their descendants roasting in hell because he knows that this will make God sad, and he can’t strike at God directly. This is stated explicitly in the text. Someone’s goal is to have humans burning in hell for all eternity and you call him a “Humanist.” Well, at least you’ve got the Father of Lies thing down.

But anyway, that wasn’t my main point. My main point is…

“Anti-racism” now has had such success as a narrative/ movement that even Satanists are afraid to be associated with racism.

Wow. That is some astounding narrative success. That could serve as a definition of what it means for a meme to propagate itself successfully and become predominant in a society.

(BTW, I’m using the original definition of “meme,” for those of you whose memory doesn’t go back further than the last three years.)

Also, I expect more from Satanists. If you’re just going to pretend to be evil because chicks like the bad boy thing, you should probably not write articles saying, “I’m really a nice guy, when it comes down to it!”

Get a grip, Satanists, and show some attitude. Either embrace the “I’m eeeeeeevil!” thing, or have the goat head tattoos removed, rip the anarchy patch off that fey little leather jacket, and start going to an Episcopalian church.

For fuck’s sake, we can’t even get quality diabolists anymore. Political correctness ruins everything.