CNN Sticks its Dick into the Beehive

CNN threatens to dox the person who came up with the “Trump slams CNN” vid meme. (See my previous post if you just got back from a trip to Ophiuchus.) Notably, they didn’t dox him and reveal the info or dox him and not reveal the info. They doxxed him and threatened to reveal the info in the future if he did anything they didn’t like. This is at least morally disgusting, punching down, bullying, and thuggish, and it is quite possibly legally actionable blackmail and/or extortion. It seems to me the guy would have a good case on at least the blackmail charge.

This was their attempt to say, “We’re tough guys, and you don’t dare mess with us!”

As a result, of course, seemingly the entire right-wing Internet started creating “beat down CNN” memes. For example, the Hulk/Loki scene from The Avengers, Trump/CNN style.

Jafrillions more are available elsewhere and more being created at a rate of a zillion per second. My humble contribution:

MemeShotgunEditThe entire Net, including left-wing commenters, has lit up with revulsion at CNN’s thuggishness. The hashtag CNNBlackmail hit Number 1 in the world on Twitter.

Here are some articles:

‘#CNNBlackmail’ trending No. 1 on Twitter

#CNNBlackmail: Outrage after network appears to threaten Reddit user

‘CNNBlackMail’ #1 Twitter Trend As Network Threatens to Reveal Reddit User’s Identity

CNN does not even understand the kind of war it’s in.

Contemplate the sheer stupidity and incompetence: CNN is apparently a media organization that has never heard of the Streisand Effect.

They’re literally that stupid.

As of this writing, all public-facing CNN Twitter accounts have gone silent and the offending page has been blanked.

From one of Vox Popoli’s posts on the imbroglio, Alice De Goon in the comments:

“Could CNN have stuck their dick any further into the beehive?”

I don’t know, but they’re probably trying.


Trumps Beats CNN Down

Trump tweets clip from old wrestling show, altered to show him giving CNN a brutal beat-down.


It’s less than 30 seconds, so go ahead and give it a watch.

Bonus: At the end, there’s a modified CNN logo saying

FNN: Fraud News Network.

The media is in full-bore fainting couch mode over this. (“Something something encourages violence against journalists,” spews the NYT.) They’re still in shock that a right-wing politician is actually fighting back. They still can’t believe that not only have they been identified as an enemy, but that he is treating them like an enemy.

Paraphrasing someone at Vox Popoli (wish I could remember who) from the last couple of months:

It surrenders or it gets the memes again.

God-Emperor, if you chance to read this, note: The Left is screaming at you to drop your Twitter account because it’s working. They’re begging Twitter to close your account because it’s working.

Of course, as a master of engaging your enemies, you already knew that. But it’s fun to say it anyway!

CNN delenda est!

CNN Producer: Russia Story is “mostly bulls–t”


In the video, when asked whether the Russia story is BS, CNN producer John Bonifield replies,

“Could be bullshit. I mean it’s mostly bullshit right now. Like, we don’t have any giant proof.”

Bonifield explained that CNN’s reason for supporting the Leftist narrative about Russia is “ratings.”

Special Elections: Four out of Four

Excellent! As of June 2017, Republicans have won four out of four special elections since the November 2016 election! STILL! NOT! TIRED! OF! WINNING!

The states in which Republican members of the House left to serve in the Trump Administration are Kansas, Montana, South Carolina and, most recently, Georgia.

The Dems are coming up with innumerable excuses for their four straight losses and it has been hilarious. A couple, like hopeless cow Rachel Maddow, have even said it was the weather in the Georgia race. For fuck’s sake, people! You lost four in a row! If that’s not “voters dislike your goals,” then what would be!?

The NYT’s priceless headline: Jon Ossoff, a Democrat, Narrowly Misses Outright Win in Georgia House Race. (No, I’m not going to give them a link.) LOL. They were just tooooooo saaaaaaad to not have the words “Ossoff” and “win” in the same headline, so they forced the weird circumlocution to put the words together. Sane person headline: Handel Wins. Or, Handel Beats Ossoff. (Maybe sounds too close to Handel beats off. How about, Handel Beats Ossoff, Without Lube. Technically true!) Or, if you must focus on the Dem for some reason: Ossoff Loses. Ossoff Looooooossssesssssssss.

Some Dems, in absolute desperation, have been saying that the margin of victory for the GOP candidates has been falling and using that to try to claim a “moral victory” or whatever. One just assumes that this is the usual blatant lying or deliberately misleading BS from the Left, but even if it’s not, it’s exactly what one would expect to see: In the original elections, there was a GOP primary. The GOP candidate most popular among GOP voters got the nomination. Since he was most popular, he got a large number of votes in the general election. Then when he went to DC to serve in the Trump Administration, the next person in line was not as popular among the GOP voters, obviously. So the Dems are saying, “Republican voters don’t like their second choice as much as they like their first choice.” No shit, idiots. And we still whip your asses.

So grok this: Not only can’t the Dems beat the Republicans’ first-best candidate in these races, they can’t even field a candidate to beat the Republicans’ second-best candidate!

Stupid as all this propaganda is, it gets worse. Notice they don’t point out that Handel’s margin of victory was larger than Trump’s margin of victory in November, and thus infer that Republicans’ popularity is rising. And in that particular Georgia district, Trump only beat Felonia von Pantsuit by one point in November 2016, and Handel beat Ossoff by about 4 points in June 2017. So by that metric, there was a 3-point improvement in the GOP’s performance.

Oh, but it gets more ridiculous. In the Georgia race, for example, the Dem in the replacement election, Ossoff, got about the same number of votes (24 fewer, actually) as the Dem in the original election, one Rodney Stooksbury, despite the fact that Stooksbury spent zero dollars in that election! Ossoff spent more than $23 million.

Also, as the foregoing link points out, Democrats didn’t even field a candidate for the district in 2004 or in 2010. So when Dems claim that Republican special election candidates are winning by smaller margins than usual – even if that’s not just the usual leftist lying – it’s compared to Republican victories some of which were blowouts because there wasn’t even a Dem opponent! To coin a phrase: LOL.

In fact, it’s not clear that Rodney Stooksbury exists either. He had no web site, Facebook page, or photo for the press.

So their spinning starts out damn weak, with, “Ha! You didn’t kick our ass as thoroughly as you have in the past!” This is the best attempt to save face they can come up with, which is not surprising since they lost. And it goes from damn weak to unbelievably pathetic when you realize that their complete argument is, “When we actually field a team, you don’t win as thoroughly as when we default due to not showing up!” No kidding.

It’s time to put it to bed, retards. Stop the “trannies in your daughter’s 8th grade bathroom” crap and white genocide vileness. But for this to happen, the old-school leftists who just want more welfare and a 10% larger budget for NPR are going to have to muster the backbone to purge the “trannies and white genocide” crowd from the “Democratic” Party.

Feel the Irony, Bitchez – Long, Deep, and Hard

Lately, faculty at colleges and universities have begun to be alarmed at their students’ contempt for freedom of speech and increasing thuggishness.

Here is just a small set of examples:

1) SJW thugs run amok at Evergreen State College in Washington:

“Bret Weinstein is a biology professor at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash., who supported Bernie Sanders, admiringly retweets Glenn Greenwald and was an outspoken supporter of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

You could be forgiven for thinking that Mr. Weinstein, who identifies himself as ‘deeply progressive,’ is just the kind of teacher that students at one of the most left-wing colleges in the country would admire. Instead, he has become a victim of an increasingly widespread campaign by leftist students.”

2) Allison Stanger, a self-described liberal professor at Middlebury College, was assaulted by leftist students when she tried to have a debate with Charles Murray. She suffered from whiplash and a concussion due to the attack. The fact that she was going to be debating him – “to grill” him, in her words – didn’t save her from the left-wing hate mob.

3) A black movie professor and self-described feminist was driven from academia by her students, a bunch of snowflake fascists who interpreted just about everything in her class as trauma-inducing.

4) At Reason, the title says it all: Reed College Professor on Social Justice Left: “I Am a Gay Mixed-Race Woman. I Am Intimidated By These Students”
The sub-heading: Queer, leftist professors and filmmakers are afraid of being sent to the guillotine by self-professed radical students.

In that article a professor says,

I am intimidated by these students. I am scared to teach courses on race, gender, or sexuality, or even texts that bring these issues up in any way—and I am a gay mixed-race woman. There is a serious problem here… and I’m at a loss as to how to begin to address it, especially since many of these students don’t believe in either historicity or objective facts. (They denounce the latter as being a tool of the white cisheteropatriarchy.)

Who taught them that, morons? YOU DID! You leftist college professors did, for decades! Now the inevitable consequences have arrived. What the hell did you think would happen when you taught students that objective facts are a tool of the white patriarchy? That they’d respect your claims about objective facts? You thought they’d never turn on you because… what, exactly? Because you’re so wonderful? Because the students you’ve trained to be aggressive confrontational thugs would exercise self-restraint? Oooooooops!

Two professors chatting on a college campus circa 1990:
“Let’s create an utterly amoral hate mob. That can only end well, right?”
“Yeah, what could go wrong?”


A liberal can be defined as someone who is so stupid that after they spend a quarter-century teaching students that facts are a tool of the heteropatriarchy, they are surprised when their students tell them that facts are a tool of the heteropatriarchy. A liberal can be defined as someone who is so stupid that after they spend decades arguing that the idea of freedom of speech is just a rhetorical trap of institutionalized power, they are surprised when their students try to silence them, and justify it by saying that the idea of freedom of speech is just a rhetorical trap of institutionalized power.

There is literally no limit to the stupidity of leftists. It goes on and on, forever. Spinoza was only a little off when he said that to grasp infinity, one need only contemplate the extent of human stupidity. He should have said, the extent of leftist stupidity, and he would have been spot on. It’s a little-known fact that when Georg Cantor was developing the foundations of transfinite mathematics, he used the stupidity of leftists as motivating examples.

But it gets better.

If you’ve been to college in the last few decades, you know that a significant fraction of lefty professors have this famous passage about Nazi Germany on their office doors:

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Socialist.

Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.

Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.

Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

How many of these leftist profs who were happy when the hate mob was going after conservatives have this on their office doors? How many will perceive the irony now that the mob is after them? Hell, never mind the irony; how many of them will even realize that they are in that scenario?

Not to worry, though, lefties! We conservatives and libertarians will now spend a lot of time and energy defending your right to BWAHHHHHHHHHH HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!

No, sorry. You spent decades carefully crafting this shit sandwich.

You are now going to eat it.




News Flash: Something Happens, Leftists Call Someone Racist

In January I noted that the left has crippled themselves with total reliance on the identity politics scam, becoming

so dependent on it that they literally have forgotten how to make an argument. Quick, argue for your environmental policies! “Uh… pollution disproportionately affects the Third World, so if you’re not a hard-core eco-nut you’re RACIST!” Argue for higher welfare spending! “Uh… women are disproportionately dependent on welfare, so if you want less of it you’re MISOGYNIST!” Etc.

Well, here’s the latest from the ACLU on President Trump (I still love saying that: PRESIDENT TRUMP!) tossing the Paris agreement over the side:

ACLU Claims U.S. Pulling Out of Paris Climate Agreement Is Racist.

In a hypoxic tweet the ACLU ejaculated, “Pulling out of the Paris Agreement would be a massive step back for racial justice, and an assault on communities of color across the U.S.” After checking in the mirror to make sure their brows were furrowed deeply enough, they added, “Drought, hurricanes and flooding will impact every American— but climate change doesn’t affect us all equally…”

Guess who climate change disproportionately hurts, according to the ACLU. That’s right, white men! Ha, just kidding. It’s minorities. Surprise! The ACLU didn’t add, probably because it wouldn’t fit in a tweet, that global warming unfairly targets Muslim transvestites.

If you’re young enough you’ll find this hard to believe, but there was a time when not just some, but most policy debates actually involved things other than randomly-generated accusations of bigotry.

By the way, would it be bad form to gloat about the Paris thing? It would? Oh well. G L O A T.

(Via Ace of Spades.)

Comey Testimony Destroys Anti-Trump Narrative

Via Chateau Heartiste, video of James Comey testifying before Congress earlier this month, May 3.

Comey said there has not been any political pressure to halt an investigation:

…oftentimes they give us opinions that we don’t see a case there and so you ought to stop investing resources in it. But I’m talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal.

It’s not happened in my experience.

That 44 seconds of video is absolutely lethal for the Left. God really hates Leftists. He has made them too insane to even check their basic stories any more before they start spewing them.

I mean think about it; all the Washington Post et al had to do before they started spewing their latest narrative was check their archives for any Comey quotes that might refute it. They were too lazy and stupid to even do that! And they’re ostensibly a news organization, for fuck’s sake! How hard can it be!? Checking that sort of thing is supposed to be part of their core skill set! And they can’t even do that, and they didn’t predict they’d get their asses handed to them by the distributed information militia on the Net. Man, the Old Media is lame.

Now the question he’s responding to in the clip is about pressure from the Department of Justice. But if he’d gotten pressure from the White House, Comey would have taken that opportunity to mention it. He wouldn’t have just it slide.

Nope, nada, nothing. It was a perfect opportunity to say so if he were feeling pressure from any quarter, but he had nothing to say.

So the Left’s latest anti-Trump narrative is done.

You might say, “But the media is so cynical they don’t care whether it’s true or not; they’ll just bury this story.”

Of course they will! But what’s their endgame here? Remember, all this Russia/Comey crap is a desperate Hail Mary pass by the Left to try to get the T-Dawg impeached and removed from office. Snort. No, it’s not going to get anywhere near happening, but the point is, they’re desperately hoping it will. But even in their lunatic fantasy scenario in which impeachment proceedings occur (seriously, what planet are these people living on?), that involves a lot of procedure and testimony and digging up evidence.

So then this videoclip would spread and every non-cuck GOP Senator and member of the House, and Fox News, and every right-wing (or indeed, sane) person on the Net would be shouting this piece of testimony from the rooftops. The President, in making his defense, would of course play this video, or have his lawyers play it, before Congress. He might even tweet it to the world. This impeachment crap is even more of a non-starter than we thought it was. There’s simply nowhere to go when the star, lynchpin witness for the prosecution is on video saying, “The defendant didn’t do it.”

Thank God the Left is so stupid, impatient, and impulsive. How were these assclowns winning for 50 years? Oh, right, we hadn’t started fighting yet. We get one major victory – the election of Trump – and they lose their last fingernail grip on sanity. Sad!